Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Monday, April 27, 2015
Lili's quote for the day
The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected.
- Will Rogers
Lili's free and uncensored thought of the day (courtesy of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution)
Two news articles that say so much about the parlous state of free speech in Australia:
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/dont-rock-the-boat-on-the-anzac-tradition-20150427-1mtinw.html
"But the outcome makes it clear: only one version of the Anzac legend can be proclaimed in this brave, pluralistic nation of ours. Dissidents will simply not be tolerated."
http://www.smh.com.au/national/headspace-mcdonaldisation-of-youth-mental-healthcare-a-ticking-time-bomb-20150425-1mszey.html
"He said senior politicians in Canberra had told him they now regret how quickly the program has been expanded but they said headspace could not be challenged because it was like "questioning the Pope"."
Lili's suggestion of the day
Tonight SBS broadcast a documentary show from the UK that asked questions about supposed differences in the brains of men and women, boys and girls, questions like "Are women better than men at reading emotions?". I suggest reading this blog article of mine to get an idea of some of the evidence pertinent to that question, or even better, read Dr Cordelia Fine's book Delusions of Gender.
Saturday, April 25, 2015
John Mendoza slams Headspace
Stark, Jill and Vedelago, Chris (2015) Headspace: 'McDonaldisation' of youth mental healthcare a ticking time bomb. Brisbane Times. April 26, 2015 - 9:27am.
"John Mendoza, former chief executive of the Mental Health Council of Australia and a previous chair of a headspace centre in Queensland, said the original intent of the service had been "perverted" and the national head office had become "obsessed with brand and marketing"."
Nice work Jill Stark and Chris Vedelago!
See/hear also this radio story:
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lifematters/is-headspace-effective-in-youth-mental-health/6425794
Friday, April 24, 2015
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
Lili's list of "red flags" to look out for in the process of submitting a job application
Vacancies with that employer permanently open
Employer often advertising vacancies out of proportion with size of workforce and appears to have trouble keeping staff
Advertising a clutch of different jobs in the one application process
Employer still handling recruitment process through hardcopy formats while similar organizations have gone online
Online recruitment system or documents do not work properly
Basic recruitment documents such as position descriptions, application forms, questionnaires, selection criteria, resumes, covering letters and copies of certificates and qualifications apparently lost
Eccentric handling of basic recruitment documents such as position descriptions, application forms, questionnaires and selection criteria in a way that suggests a strategy to deal with loss of data in a faulty computer system
Spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors or eccentric use of capitalization in job advertisement
"Previous applicants need not apply"
Long, detailed, pretentious or unrealistically demanding lists of selection criteria peppered with management mumbo-jumbo
A list of duties a mile long attached to the position
Failure to ask applicants questions with simple and verifiable answers as a pre-screening process at the very beginning of recruitment process
Unclear, contradictory or deficient information in the job advertisement and associated documents about the basic details of the job such as employer, location, hours or permanency
During contact with employer or HR person they get you mixed-up with another applicant
Recommended reading:
How To Spot A Bad Boss -- Before You Accept The Job Offer by Lisa Quast
http://www.forbes.com/sites/lisaquast/2014/09/15/how-to-spot-a-bad-boss-before-you-accept-the-job-offer/#aa5b67675124
Lili's realistic thought for the day
What the hell do you think you look like attending an Anzac Day ceremony with a burst of grey-outlined stars all over the nape of your neck, or sporting an orange, yellow and greyish-black rooster's tail trailing up your arm? I don't care if your squiggles are permanent. I don't care if they are difficult to hide. If you aren't capable of turning up to an event looking appropriately dignified, don't turn up at all.
Saturday, April 18, 2015
Another quote from the book Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime by Prof. Peter C. Gotzsche
From page 197
"In 2000, an antidepressant trial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine where the authors had so many conflicts of interest that there wasn't room for them in the journal; instead, they were listed on a website.40"
Friday, April 17, 2015
Lili's coastal thought of the day
I would like to invite Tony Abbott to enjoy a surfing holiday at the lovely island of La Reunion:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-3035569/Shark-kills-teenage-boy-island-Reunion.html
Monday, April 13, 2015
An unhelpful synergy between trashy neuroscience and mediocre science journalism
This is a pop science magazine article about acquired savant
syndrome and Jason Padgett, a case who appears to be very much modelled on the
story of Daniel Tammet:
Treffert, Darold (2014) Accidental genius. Scientific
American. August 2014. P.42-47.
and this is a pop science magazine article about acquired savant
syndrome and Derek Amato, a case who appears to be very much modelled on the
story of Daniel Tammet:
Piore, Adam (2013) When Brain Damage Unlocks The Genius
Within. Popular Science (website) February 19th 2013.
Piore, Adam (2013) The genius within. Popular Science. March
2013. Vol 282 Issue 3 p.46-53.
Both articles appear to describe this 2012 study by Alan
Snyder and Richard Chi:
but it is disappointing that neither article gave a proper
citation to the paper, so I can only guess.
It is worth noting that Snyder and Chi did a similar study
that was published in 2011:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016655
That study and associated excitable press commentary
inspired an interesting article in the Guardian newspaper criticising the media hype and
the study itself:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/feb/16/thinking-caps-pseudoscience-neuroscience
Wednesday, April 08, 2015
A quote from the book Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime by Dr Peter C. Gotzsche
From page 229
"Antipsychotics are dangerous drugs that should only be used if there is a compelling reason, and preferably as short-term therapy at a low dose because the drugs produce severe and permanent brain damage. As explained above, even most patients with schizophrenia can avoid the drugs and it results in much better long-term outcomes than if they were treated and substantial savings as well.21"
There's a bombshell on every page of this book by Professor Gotzsche, a physician and co-founder of the highly respected Cochrane Collaboration and Director of the Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration is an international organization of doctors who create systematic reviews of all of the scientific evidence pertinent to questions about drugs and medical practices and other types of interventions. I highly recommend Prof. Gotzsche's book.
Tuesday, April 07, 2015
Friday, April 03, 2015
Lili's question of the day
I've got to wonder whether the three gutless dorks shown in this video shouting and waving flags with their faces concealed under a covering of flags, in a style that makes one think of the KKK in the USA, advocate for the banning of the burqa.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-04/reclaim-australia-extremism-rallies-face-tolerance-groups/6370672
Thursday, April 02, 2015
Australian novelist Tim Winton gives Australians something to think about this Easter
Lili's disdainful thought of the day
Unfortunately the foolishness isn't limited to April:
https://storify.com/LetToysBeToys/notaprilfools