Lili's question for the day

Have the Australian Skeptics ever had anything to say or written anything in print about the real story behind Daniel Tammet? I'm guessing that their coverage of Tammet/Corney would be as extensive as their critiques of the many sloppy practices found in research in the humanities and their reviews of the many corrupting conflicts of interest in mainstream medical science. I'm guessing that they haven't written a word about Tammet.