Morris, Linda (2012) Nothing wrong with humble pi. Canberra
Times. canberratimes.com.au August 12th 2012.
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/entertainment/books/nothing-wrong-with-humble-pi-20120811-240n2.html#ixzz23fffOxzM
Sydney Morning Herald. smh.com.au August 12th 2012.
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/books/nothing-wrong-with-humble-pi-20120811-240n2.html
Sydney Morning Herald. smh.com.au August 12th 2012.
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/books/nothing-wrong-with-humble-pi-20120811-240n2.html
"When, in 2004, Tammet stood before an audience at
Oxford University's Museum of the History of Science to recite the 22,514
digits of pi, collecting a European record, he had the numbers printed on
letter-sized sheets, a thousand digits to a page and perused them as a painter
interprets light."
But.....wouldn't that have been cheating? WTF does Linda
Morris, features writer for The Canberra Times think a recitation of the number
Pi actually is? Just some person standing in front of a group of supervisors
reading the number off a massive big print-out from some computer? What? What
would that prove? What would be the point? Anyone could do such a thing. It's dumb
enough that Linda has done what countless "journalists" have done
before her - write an unskeptical and fawning interview article about Daniel
Tammet/Corney, but she also clearly doesn't have the slightest idea what a Pi
recitation is, and also shows complete ignorance of the existence of memory
sport, memory strategies such as the "memory palace" otherwise known
as the "method of loci", and of course, complete ignorance of
Tammet's life before he changed his surname from Corney, including his years as
a competitor in the World Memory Championships.
"Tammet's rare
form of Asperger syndrome, diagnosed when he was 25, makes social interaction
difficult but rendered this most astonishing feat of mental alacrity a
relatively easy task. With characteristic understatement, Tammet concedes he
has what others regard as a good memory, and lucked in with the type of mind
that can easily recall birthdays, anniversaries and phone numbers."
Poor Linda clearly has no idea that currently there are a
total of ninety-eight women and men ranked above Daniel Corney, who is Daniel
Tammet before his name change, in the international ranking of the World Memory
Championship. I'm sure that if Ms Morris had bothered to contact any one of
those memory sport champions, they would have informed her that their memory
feats are the result of the determined application of memory techniques, and
are not a natural consequence of
Asperger syndrome, autism or some other type of mysterious savantism. But Linda
didn't.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised to find such dumb-***kery
published in The Canberra Times, because, as Mr Tammet the self-appointed numbers expert might well point out,
the numbers predict that such unforgivably sloppy and stupid journalism will
occur and even predominate in coverage of Daniel Tammet, just because of a process of elimination. Perhaps most journalists in the
world suspect or know that there is something sus about Daniel
Tammet. The trouble is, they probably
wouldn't be the journalists to seek or to be granted an interview with the man.
The good journalists will probably not be represented at all among the set of
journalists who have written about Tammet. They will be absent from the Tammet
press article genre (but I'm sure they aren't losing sleep about it). I think it is fair to say that the journalist who most effectively publicized the truth about Tammet, book author Joshua Foer, initially
had a good relationship with Tammet and most likely initially set out to write
the same type of positive and ignorant piece about Tammet that is the usual
thing. Foer was in two minds about publishing his skepticism about Tammet. I picked out a lot of sloppiness in the research about synaesthesia that
went into Foer's chapter about Tammet, and with hindsight I don't think Foer is of a completely different league than other journalists who have written
about Tammet. Garbage ( in science and neuroscience reporting) gets into print. Good stuff doesn't get written, except almost by accident. Great
system we have here!
No comments:
Post a Comment